Social Security at 62 vs. Dividend Bridge: What Pays More by 75

If you're eyeing retirement and wondering whether to grab Social Security at 62 or wait while living off dividend income, you're asking one of the smartest questions in personal finance. The answer isn't simple — and it depends heavily on your health, your portfolio, and how long you expect to stick around.

Claiming Social Security at 62 means you get money sooner, but your monthly benefit is permanently reduced compared to waiting until full retirement age (somewhere between 66 and 67 for most people today) or even age 70, when benefits max out. That early discount can be significant — we're talking a meaningful cut that compounds over decades of payments.

Read more SCHH vs RWR: Picking the Right REIT ETF for Your Goals →

The "dividend bridge" strategy works differently. Instead of tapping Social Security early, you draw income from a dividend-paying stock or fund portfolio to cover living expenses while you delay claiming. The idea is that your Social Security benefit keeps growing, and eventually the higher monthly checks more than offset what you spent from your portfolio during the waiting period.

The breakeven math is the crux of the whole debate. Generally speaking, the longer you live, the more the delayed-claiming strategy pays off. If you make it to your mid-to-late 70s and beyond, waiting tends to win. But if health issues or family history suggest a shorter retirement, taking the money early and investing it — or simply spending it — might make more practical sense.

There's no universal right answer here, which is exactly why financial planners keep their phones busy. Your tax situation, other income sources, and risk tolerance all feed into the equation. Before you decide, it's worth running your own numbers with a retirement calculator or a fee-only advisor. Continue reading at Yahoo Finance.