Should You Spend Savings Now to Delay Social Security Benefits?
Timing Social Security vs. drawing down savings is a classic retirement dilemma. Here's how to think through the trade-offs.
If you're approaching retirement, you've probably wrestled with this question: should you dip into your savings earlier so you can hold off on claiming Social Security — or just take the benefit now and let your portfolio ride? It's one of the most consequential decisions you'll make, and there's no single right answer for everyone.
The core tension here is pretty straightforward. Every year you delay claiming Social Security past your full retirement age (up to age 70), your monthly benefit grows — typically by about 8% per year. That's a guaranteed, inflation-adjusted raise that's hard to beat anywhere else. But to fund your living expenses while you wait, you'd need to pull from your investments, which means those assets aren't compounding for you anymore.
Read more Florida Man Pays Off Home, Then Hurricane Milton Destroys It →
On the flip side, claiming earlier preserves your portfolio and keeps more of your money in the market, where it could theoretically grow. The question is whether that growth realistically outpaces the larger Social Security checks you'd be giving up. For most people, especially those in good health who expect to live into their 80s or beyond, delaying Social Security tends to win out in the long run — but that breakeven point matters a lot.
Your personal situation — health, other income sources, tax bracket, and whether you have a spouse who might benefit from a higher survivor benefit — should heavily influence this call. A financial planner who specializes in retirement income can model out both scenarios using your actual numbers, which beats any rule of thumb you'll find online. The math is very individual, and getting it wrong could cost you tens of thousands of dollars over a long retirement.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
